How Suitable Are Registry Data for Recurrence Risk Calculations? Validation of Diagnoses on 1,593 Families With Congenital Heart Disease

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

How Suitable Are Registry Data for Recurrence Risk Calculations? Validation of Diagnoses on 1,593 Families With Congenital Heart Disease. / Ellesøe, Sabrina Gade; Jensen, Anders Boeck; Ängquist, Lars Henrik; Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth; Larsen, Lars Allan; Brunak, Søren.

In: World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery, Vol. 7, No. 2, 03.2016, p. 169-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Ellesøe, SG, Jensen, AB, Ängquist, LH, Hjortdal, VE, Larsen, LA & Brunak, S 2016, 'How Suitable Are Registry Data for Recurrence Risk Calculations? Validation of Diagnoses on 1,593 Families With Congenital Heart Disease', World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 169-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150135115615786

APA

Ellesøe, S. G., Jensen, A. B., Ängquist, L. H., Hjortdal, V. E., Larsen, L. A., & Brunak, S. (2016). How Suitable Are Registry Data for Recurrence Risk Calculations? Validation of Diagnoses on 1,593 Families With Congenital Heart Disease. World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery, 7(2), 169-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150135115615786

Vancouver

Ellesøe SG, Jensen AB, Ängquist LH, Hjortdal VE, Larsen LA, Brunak S. How Suitable Are Registry Data for Recurrence Risk Calculations? Validation of Diagnoses on 1,593 Families With Congenital Heart Disease. World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery. 2016 Mar;7(2):169-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150135115615786

Author

Ellesøe, Sabrina Gade ; Jensen, Anders Boeck ; Ängquist, Lars Henrik ; Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth ; Larsen, Lars Allan ; Brunak, Søren. / How Suitable Are Registry Data for Recurrence Risk Calculations? Validation of Diagnoses on 1,593 Families With Congenital Heart Disease. In: World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 169-77.

Bibtex

@article{5b623959850c40a18681371f3ac95b72,
title = "How Suitable Are Registry Data for Recurrence Risk Calculations?: Validation of Diagnoses on 1,593 Families With Congenital Heart Disease",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Congenital heart disease (CHD) occurs in approximately 1% of all live births, and 3% to 8% of these have until now been considered familial cases, defined as the occurrence of two or more affected individuals in a family. The validity of CHD diagnoses in Danish administrative registry data has only been studied previously in highly selected patient populations. These studies identified high positive predictive values (PPVs) and recurrence risk ratios (RRRs-ratio between probabilities of CHD given family history of CHD and no family history). However, the RRR can be distorted if registry data are used indiscriminately. Here, we investigated the consequences of misclassifications for the RRR using validated diagnoses on Danish patients with familial CHD.METHODS: Danish citizens are assigned a civil registration number (CPR number) at birth or immigration, which acts as a unique identifier in the Danish registries, thus enabling connection of information from several registries. Utilizing the CPR number, we identified Danish patients with familial CHD and reviewed each patient's file. We compared diagnoses from the registries with those manually assigned, which enabled calculation of the PPVs of diagnoses in the Danish registries, and from this, we deduced the false discovery rate (FDR). To measure the consequences on the RRR, the FDR was applied to a simulated data set with true RRR values of 2 and 10.RESULTS: We validated diagnoses of 2,442 patients from 1,593 families. Of these, 874 patients were misclassified corresponding to an FDR of 36%. Applying this FDR on the simulated data sets, we found that the RRR decreased from 2 and 10 to 1.4 and 5.1, respectively. Lastly, we estimated that 11% of all cases with CHD were familial.CONCLUSION: We found that approximately one of nine of all cases with CHD are familial, and we also found that 36% of individuals with CHD in administrative medical registries are misclassified, which distort the RRR in simulated scenarios.",
author = "Elles{\o}e, {Sabrina Gade} and Jensen, {Anders Boeck} and {\"A}ngquist, {Lars Henrik} and Hjortdal, {Vibeke Elisabeth} and Larsen, {Lars Allan} and S{\o}ren Brunak",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2015.",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1177/2150135115615786",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "169--77",
journal = "World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery",
issn = "2150-1351",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Suitable Are Registry Data for Recurrence Risk Calculations?

T2 - Validation of Diagnoses on 1,593 Families With Congenital Heart Disease

AU - Ellesøe, Sabrina Gade

AU - Jensen, Anders Boeck

AU - Ängquist, Lars Henrik

AU - Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth

AU - Larsen, Lars Allan

AU - Brunak, Søren

N1 - © The Author(s) 2015.

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: Congenital heart disease (CHD) occurs in approximately 1% of all live births, and 3% to 8% of these have until now been considered familial cases, defined as the occurrence of two or more affected individuals in a family. The validity of CHD diagnoses in Danish administrative registry data has only been studied previously in highly selected patient populations. These studies identified high positive predictive values (PPVs) and recurrence risk ratios (RRRs-ratio between probabilities of CHD given family history of CHD and no family history). However, the RRR can be distorted if registry data are used indiscriminately. Here, we investigated the consequences of misclassifications for the RRR using validated diagnoses on Danish patients with familial CHD.METHODS: Danish citizens are assigned a civil registration number (CPR number) at birth or immigration, which acts as a unique identifier in the Danish registries, thus enabling connection of information from several registries. Utilizing the CPR number, we identified Danish patients with familial CHD and reviewed each patient's file. We compared diagnoses from the registries with those manually assigned, which enabled calculation of the PPVs of diagnoses in the Danish registries, and from this, we deduced the false discovery rate (FDR). To measure the consequences on the RRR, the FDR was applied to a simulated data set with true RRR values of 2 and 10.RESULTS: We validated diagnoses of 2,442 patients from 1,593 families. Of these, 874 patients were misclassified corresponding to an FDR of 36%. Applying this FDR on the simulated data sets, we found that the RRR decreased from 2 and 10 to 1.4 and 5.1, respectively. Lastly, we estimated that 11% of all cases with CHD were familial.CONCLUSION: We found that approximately one of nine of all cases with CHD are familial, and we also found that 36% of individuals with CHD in administrative medical registries are misclassified, which distort the RRR in simulated scenarios.

AB - BACKGROUND: Congenital heart disease (CHD) occurs in approximately 1% of all live births, and 3% to 8% of these have until now been considered familial cases, defined as the occurrence of two or more affected individuals in a family. The validity of CHD diagnoses in Danish administrative registry data has only been studied previously in highly selected patient populations. These studies identified high positive predictive values (PPVs) and recurrence risk ratios (RRRs-ratio between probabilities of CHD given family history of CHD and no family history). However, the RRR can be distorted if registry data are used indiscriminately. Here, we investigated the consequences of misclassifications for the RRR using validated diagnoses on Danish patients with familial CHD.METHODS: Danish citizens are assigned a civil registration number (CPR number) at birth or immigration, which acts as a unique identifier in the Danish registries, thus enabling connection of information from several registries. Utilizing the CPR number, we identified Danish patients with familial CHD and reviewed each patient's file. We compared diagnoses from the registries with those manually assigned, which enabled calculation of the PPVs of diagnoses in the Danish registries, and from this, we deduced the false discovery rate (FDR). To measure the consequences on the RRR, the FDR was applied to a simulated data set with true RRR values of 2 and 10.RESULTS: We validated diagnoses of 2,442 patients from 1,593 families. Of these, 874 patients were misclassified corresponding to an FDR of 36%. Applying this FDR on the simulated data sets, we found that the RRR decreased from 2 and 10 to 1.4 and 5.1, respectively. Lastly, we estimated that 11% of all cases with CHD were familial.CONCLUSION: We found that approximately one of nine of all cases with CHD are familial, and we also found that 36% of individuals with CHD in administrative medical registries are misclassified, which distort the RRR in simulated scenarios.

U2 - 10.1177/2150135115615786

DO - 10.1177/2150135115615786

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26957399

VL - 7

SP - 169

EP - 177

JO - World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery

JF - World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery

SN - 2150-1351

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 160018200