Survival prediction in intensive-care units based on aggregation of long-term disease history and acute physiology: a retrospective study of the Danish National Patient Registry and electronic patient records

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Survival prediction in intensive-care units based on aggregation of long-term disease history and acute physiology : a retrospective study of the Danish National Patient Registry and electronic patient records. / Nielsen, Annelaura B.; Thorsen-Meyer, Hans Christian; Belling, Kirstine; Nielsen, Anna P.; Thomas, Cecilia E.; Chmura, Piotr J.; Lademann, Mette; Moseley, Pope L.; Heimann, Marc; Dybdahl, Lars; Spangsege, Lasse; Hulsen, Patrick; Perner, Anders; Brunak, Søren.

In: The Lancet Digital Health, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2019, p. e78-e89.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Nielsen, AB, Thorsen-Meyer, HC, Belling, K, Nielsen, AP, Thomas, CE, Chmura, PJ, Lademann, M, Moseley, PL, Heimann, M, Dybdahl, L, Spangsege, L, Hulsen, P, Perner, A & Brunak, S 2019, 'Survival prediction in intensive-care units based on aggregation of long-term disease history and acute physiology: a retrospective study of the Danish National Patient Registry and electronic patient records', The Lancet Digital Health, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. e78-e89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30024-X

APA

Nielsen, A. B., Thorsen-Meyer, H. C., Belling, K., Nielsen, A. P., Thomas, C. E., Chmura, P. J., Lademann, M., Moseley, P. L., Heimann, M., Dybdahl, L., Spangsege, L., Hulsen, P., Perner, A., & Brunak, S. (2019). Survival prediction in intensive-care units based on aggregation of long-term disease history and acute physiology: a retrospective study of the Danish National Patient Registry and electronic patient records. The Lancet Digital Health, 1(2), e78-e89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30024-X

Vancouver

Nielsen AB, Thorsen-Meyer HC, Belling K, Nielsen AP, Thomas CE, Chmura PJ et al. Survival prediction in intensive-care units based on aggregation of long-term disease history and acute physiology: a retrospective study of the Danish National Patient Registry and electronic patient records. The Lancet Digital Health. 2019;1(2):e78-e89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30024-X

Author

Nielsen, Annelaura B. ; Thorsen-Meyer, Hans Christian ; Belling, Kirstine ; Nielsen, Anna P. ; Thomas, Cecilia E. ; Chmura, Piotr J. ; Lademann, Mette ; Moseley, Pope L. ; Heimann, Marc ; Dybdahl, Lars ; Spangsege, Lasse ; Hulsen, Patrick ; Perner, Anders ; Brunak, Søren. / Survival prediction in intensive-care units based on aggregation of long-term disease history and acute physiology : a retrospective study of the Danish National Patient Registry and electronic patient records. In: The Lancet Digital Health. 2019 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. e78-e89.

Bibtex

@article{04a3d2f6bb0149099b8ffcdf70398d6d,
title = "Survival prediction in intensive-care units based on aggregation of long-term disease history and acute physiology: a retrospective study of the Danish National Patient Registry and electronic patient records",
abstract = "Background: Intensive-care units (ICUs) treat the most critically ill patients, which is complicated by the heterogeneity of the diseases that they encounter. Severity scores based mainly on acute physiology measures collected at ICU admission are used to predict mortality, but are non-specific, and predictions for individual patients can be inaccurate. We investigated whether inclusion of long-term disease history before ICU admission improves mortality predictions. Methods: Registry data for long-term disease histories for more than 230 000 Danish ICU patients were used in a neural network to develop an ICU mortality prediction model. Long-term disease histories and acute physiology measures were aggregated to predict mortality risk for patients for whom both registry and ICU electronic patient record data were available. We compared mortality predictions with admission scores on the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, the Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, and the best available multimorbidity score, the Multimorbidity Index. An external validation set from an additional hospital was acquired after model construction to confirm the validity of our model. During initial model development data were split into a training set (85%) and an independent test set (15%), and a five-fold cross-validation was done during training to avoid overfitting. Neural networks were trained for datasets with disease history of 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2·5 years, 5 years, 7·5 years, 10 years, and 23 years before ICU admission. Findings: Mortality predictions with a model based solely on disease history outperformed the Multimorbidity Index (Matthews correlation coefficient 0·265 vs 0·065), and performed similarly to SAPS II and APACHE II (Matthews correlation coefficient with disease history, age, and sex 0·326 vs 0·347 and 0·300 for SAPS II and APACHE II, respectively). Diagnoses up to 10 years before ICU admission affected current mortality prediction. Aggregation of previous disease history and acute physiology measures in a neural network yielded the most precise predictions of in-hospital mortality (Matthews correlation coefficient 0·391 for in-hospital mortality compared with 0·347 with SAPS II and 0·300 with APACHE II). These results for the aggregated model were validated in an external independent dataset of 1528 patients (Matthews correlation coefficient for prediction of in-hospital mortality 0·341). Interpretation: Longitudinal disease-spectrum-wide data available before ICU admission are useful for mortality prediction. Disease history can be used to differentiate mortality risk between patients with similar vital signs with more precision than SAPS II and APACHE II scores. Machine learning models can be deconvoluted to generate novel understandings of how ICU patient features from long-term and short-term events interact with each other. Explainable machine learning models are key in clinical settings, and our results emphasise how to progress towards the transformation of advanced models into actionable, transparent, and trustworthy clinical tools. Funding: Novo Nordisk Foundation and Innovation Fund Denmark.",
author = "Nielsen, {Annelaura B.} and Thorsen-Meyer, {Hans Christian} and Kirstine Belling and Nielsen, {Anna P.} and Thomas, {Cecilia E.} and Chmura, {Piotr J.} and Mette Lademann and Moseley, {Pope L.} and Marc Heimann and Lars Dybdahl and Lasse Spangsege and Patrick Hulsen and Anders Perner and S{\o}ren Brunak",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30024-X",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "e78--e89",
journal = "The Lancet Digital Health",
issn = "2589-7500",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survival prediction in intensive-care units based on aggregation of long-term disease history and acute physiology

T2 - a retrospective study of the Danish National Patient Registry and electronic patient records

AU - Nielsen, Annelaura B.

AU - Thorsen-Meyer, Hans Christian

AU - Belling, Kirstine

AU - Nielsen, Anna P.

AU - Thomas, Cecilia E.

AU - Chmura, Piotr J.

AU - Lademann, Mette

AU - Moseley, Pope L.

AU - Heimann, Marc

AU - Dybdahl, Lars

AU - Spangsege, Lasse

AU - Hulsen, Patrick

AU - Perner, Anders

AU - Brunak, Søren

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Background: Intensive-care units (ICUs) treat the most critically ill patients, which is complicated by the heterogeneity of the diseases that they encounter. Severity scores based mainly on acute physiology measures collected at ICU admission are used to predict mortality, but are non-specific, and predictions for individual patients can be inaccurate. We investigated whether inclusion of long-term disease history before ICU admission improves mortality predictions. Methods: Registry data for long-term disease histories for more than 230 000 Danish ICU patients were used in a neural network to develop an ICU mortality prediction model. Long-term disease histories and acute physiology measures were aggregated to predict mortality risk for patients for whom both registry and ICU electronic patient record data were available. We compared mortality predictions with admission scores on the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, the Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, and the best available multimorbidity score, the Multimorbidity Index. An external validation set from an additional hospital was acquired after model construction to confirm the validity of our model. During initial model development data were split into a training set (85%) and an independent test set (15%), and a five-fold cross-validation was done during training to avoid overfitting. Neural networks were trained for datasets with disease history of 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2·5 years, 5 years, 7·5 years, 10 years, and 23 years before ICU admission. Findings: Mortality predictions with a model based solely on disease history outperformed the Multimorbidity Index (Matthews correlation coefficient 0·265 vs 0·065), and performed similarly to SAPS II and APACHE II (Matthews correlation coefficient with disease history, age, and sex 0·326 vs 0·347 and 0·300 for SAPS II and APACHE II, respectively). Diagnoses up to 10 years before ICU admission affected current mortality prediction. Aggregation of previous disease history and acute physiology measures in a neural network yielded the most precise predictions of in-hospital mortality (Matthews correlation coefficient 0·391 for in-hospital mortality compared with 0·347 with SAPS II and 0·300 with APACHE II). These results for the aggregated model were validated in an external independent dataset of 1528 patients (Matthews correlation coefficient for prediction of in-hospital mortality 0·341). Interpretation: Longitudinal disease-spectrum-wide data available before ICU admission are useful for mortality prediction. Disease history can be used to differentiate mortality risk between patients with similar vital signs with more precision than SAPS II and APACHE II scores. Machine learning models can be deconvoluted to generate novel understandings of how ICU patient features from long-term and short-term events interact with each other. Explainable machine learning models are key in clinical settings, and our results emphasise how to progress towards the transformation of advanced models into actionable, transparent, and trustworthy clinical tools. Funding: Novo Nordisk Foundation and Innovation Fund Denmark.

AB - Background: Intensive-care units (ICUs) treat the most critically ill patients, which is complicated by the heterogeneity of the diseases that they encounter. Severity scores based mainly on acute physiology measures collected at ICU admission are used to predict mortality, but are non-specific, and predictions for individual patients can be inaccurate. We investigated whether inclusion of long-term disease history before ICU admission improves mortality predictions. Methods: Registry data for long-term disease histories for more than 230 000 Danish ICU patients were used in a neural network to develop an ICU mortality prediction model. Long-term disease histories and acute physiology measures were aggregated to predict mortality risk for patients for whom both registry and ICU electronic patient record data were available. We compared mortality predictions with admission scores on the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, the Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, and the best available multimorbidity score, the Multimorbidity Index. An external validation set from an additional hospital was acquired after model construction to confirm the validity of our model. During initial model development data were split into a training set (85%) and an independent test set (15%), and a five-fold cross-validation was done during training to avoid overfitting. Neural networks were trained for datasets with disease history of 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2·5 years, 5 years, 7·5 years, 10 years, and 23 years before ICU admission. Findings: Mortality predictions with a model based solely on disease history outperformed the Multimorbidity Index (Matthews correlation coefficient 0·265 vs 0·065), and performed similarly to SAPS II and APACHE II (Matthews correlation coefficient with disease history, age, and sex 0·326 vs 0·347 and 0·300 for SAPS II and APACHE II, respectively). Diagnoses up to 10 years before ICU admission affected current mortality prediction. Aggregation of previous disease history and acute physiology measures in a neural network yielded the most precise predictions of in-hospital mortality (Matthews correlation coefficient 0·391 for in-hospital mortality compared with 0·347 with SAPS II and 0·300 with APACHE II). These results for the aggregated model were validated in an external independent dataset of 1528 patients (Matthews correlation coefficient for prediction of in-hospital mortality 0·341). Interpretation: Longitudinal disease-spectrum-wide data available before ICU admission are useful for mortality prediction. Disease history can be used to differentiate mortality risk between patients with similar vital signs with more precision than SAPS II and APACHE II scores. Machine learning models can be deconvoluted to generate novel understandings of how ICU patient features from long-term and short-term events interact with each other. Explainable machine learning models are key in clinical settings, and our results emphasise how to progress towards the transformation of advanced models into actionable, transparent, and trustworthy clinical tools. Funding: Novo Nordisk Foundation and Innovation Fund Denmark.

U2 - 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30024-X

DO - 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30024-X

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85070217914

VL - 1

SP - e78-e89

JO - The Lancet Digital Health

JF - The Lancet Digital Health

SN - 2589-7500

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 235532447