Benchmarking common quantification strategies for large-scale phosphoproteomics

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  • Alexander Hogrebe
  • Louise von Stechow
  • Dorte B. Bekker-Jensen
  • Brian T. Weinert
  • Christian D. Kelstrup
  • Olsen, Jesper Velgaard

Comprehensive mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is now feasible, but reproducible quantification remains challenging, especially for post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation. Here, we compare the most popular quantification techniques for global phosphoproteomics: label-free quantification (LFQ), stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and MS2- and MS3-measured tandem mass tags (TMT). In a mixed species comparison with fixed phosphopeptide ratios, we find LFQ and SILAC to be the most accurate techniques. MS2-based TMT yields the highest precision but lowest accuracy due to ratio compression, which MS3-based TMT can partly rescue. However, MS2-based TMT outperforms MS3-based TMT when analyzing phosphoproteome changes in the DNA damage response, since its higher precision and larger identification numbers allow detection of a greater number of significantly regulated phosphopeptides. Finally, we utilize the TMT multiplexing capabilities to develop an algorithm for determining phosphorylation site stoichiometry, showing that such applications benefit from the high accuracy of MS3-based TMT.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1045
JournalNature Communications
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)1-13
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and

No data available

ID: 194518468